Embarking on a Northbound (NOBO) journey along the Continental Divide Trail (CDT) demands careful planning, especially when it comes to navigation. The decision to carry paper maps alongside electronic ones is a strategic choice, considering the trail’s less-traveled nature and the potential for electronic failures. This article explores the considerations, recommendations, and experiences of hikers regarding the use of paper maps on the CDT.
The Case for Paper Maps
The less-traveled nature of the CDT and the possibility of electronic failures make paper maps a prudent choice for hikers. However, the concern about the weight of maps prompts questions about the type, scale, and frequency of carrying paper maps.
Types of Paper Maps
Several experienced hikers on the trail recommend carrying both the official Continental Divide Trail Coalition (CDTC) maps and the Ley maps. The CDTC maps are known for their utility in hour-to-hour navigation, providing essential details for immediate route decisions. On the other hand, the Ley maps are favored for daily and section planning, offering a broader perspective on the trail. While CDTC maps are generally easier to read, some hikers appreciate the additional details provided by the Ley maps.
Printing Options and Costs
Printing maps at a local copy center is a popular choice, with an approximate cost of $250 mentioned by one hiker for the entire trail. The preferred paper size is often 8.5×11, although there’s a suggestion to consider enlarging Ley maps to 11×17 for improved readability. The weight of printed maps varies based on the sections carried, ranging from 3-4oz to 12oz for larger sections.
Resupply Strategies
Map management is intertwined with resupply strategies, with some hikers opting for a combination of town resupplies and maildrops. The frequency of receiving maps influences the weight carried, necessitating careful planning for longer sections, such as Leadore to Helena.
Map Sets and Their Pros and Cons
Different map sets, such as Bear Creek Survey maps and National Geographic (Nat Geo) maps, have their advantages and drawbacks. Bear Creek maps are praised for their use of Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) grid, crucial for accurate compass work. Nat Geo maps, on the other hand, are appreciated for their topographical details and comprehensive information on surrounding terrain and side trails.
Electronic Navigation Tools
Some hikers share their experiences of relying more on electronic navigation tools, such as phones with apps like FarOut Guide or Guthooks. The preference for digital navigation is attributed to ease of use and continuous updates provided by these apps. However, instances are highlighted where paper maps served as valuable backups during glitches or unexpected phone issues.
Individual Preferences and Conclusion
The choice to carry paper maps on the CDT ultimately depends on individual preferences and needs. Hikers who enjoy a broader view for planning and find satisfaction in identifying landmarks on paper during scenic moments often deem the use of paper maps worthwhile. Others argue that on well-trodden trails like the Appalachian Trail (AT), paper maps may be less essential for navigation but can enhance the overall hiking experience.
In conclusion, the decision to carry paper maps on the CDT involves weighing the benefits of redundancy and the tangible advantages of paper in certain situations against the added weight and potential redundancy with electronic navigation tools. Careful consideration of individual preferences, resupply strategies, and the specific advantages of each map set will contribute to a well-informed decision for a successful NOBO hike on the Continental Divide Trail.
