Ultralight backpacking has gained immense popularity over the years, and a key element in this revolution is the adoption of frameless backpacks. Since the early 2000s, these minimalist packs have become a favorite among hikers pursuing lightweight and efficient gear setups. In this article, we’ll delve into the reasons behind choosing a frameless backpack, address common questions associated with them, and provide a curated list of 15 highly regarded frameless models.
Why Choose a Frameless Backpack?
Simplicity: Frameless packs boast simpler designs with fewer components like zippers, compartments, and stays. This simplicity translates to fewer potential points of failure, making them reliable companions on the trail.
Fit: The load itself provides the structure in frameless backpacks. By utilizing an unrolled or folded sleeping mat as a makeshift framesheet, these packs mold to the contours of your back. Attention to proper packing is crucial for optimal comfort, as a haphazardly packed load can lead to discomfort.
Weight and Durability: With a simpler design and the absence of framesheets or stays, frameless packs are inherently lighter, typically weighing around 0.6 kg (21 oz) or less. Contrary to concerns, their durability is impressive, as evidenced by models lasting over 9,000 trail miles.
Size: Frameless packs encourage a focus on essential items due to their limited capacity. If your base weight is under 4.4 kg/10 lb, a 50 L capacity is sufficient for 5 to 7 days of food and a few liters of water, promoting a more minimalist approach to packing.
Cost: Frameless models are generally more affordable than their framed counterparts, thanks to simpler designs and the use of fewer materials.
FAQs about Frameless Backpacks
Weight Considerations: For users with a base weight exceeding 5 kg (11 lb), a lightweight internal frame backpack might be more suitable for superior load distribution, especially during extended trips.
Hip Belts: While some argue that hip belts are unnecessary for frameless packs with base weights under 4.5 kg (10 lb), a minimalist hip belt can aid load stabilization, particularly in technical or off-trail conditions.
Features to Look For: Preferences vary, but a slim profile, 30-40 L capacity, wide and padded shoulder straps, shoulder pockets, and a reliable compression system are commonly favored. The inclusion of a removable hip belt pocket can be beneficial.
Bottom Pockets: While some hikers appreciate bottom pockets, others find them superfluous, favoring alternative storage options for snacks.
Recommended Fabrics: Xpac, Dyneema Composite Fabrics (DCF), and high tenacity nylons such as Dyneema X, Robic, and Cordura are popular choices. The selection depends on personal preferences and intended usage.
Recommended Frameless Backpacks
Here’s a curated list of 15 top frameless backpacks currently on the market:
Company / Model Weight (oz/kg) Volume (L) Fabric Price (US$) Notes
Atom Packs The Atom 40 14.7 40 XPac £185 Highly regarded UK-based company
Gossamer Gear Kumo 18.9 36 Robic $165 Very comfortable with a long-time fan following
MLD Burn 16.5 38 Dyneema X or DCF $220 Known for exceptional workmanship and durability
SWD Superior 35 14.5 43 Xpac or DCF $175 Offers customization options
Zpacks Nero 10.7 38 DCF $199 Lightweight with mixed durability reviews
Recommended Internal Frame Backpacks
For trips with heavier loads, here are 10 highly regarded lightweight internal frame packs:
Company / Model Weight (oz/kg) Volume (L) Fabric Price (US$) Notes
Atom Packs The Mo 50L 30 50 XPac £257 Highly regarded UK-based company
Gossamer Gear Mariposa 32.7 60 Robic $270 Larger sibling of the Gorilla
Hyperlite Mountain Gear 2400 Southwest 29.3 50 DCF $310 Known for comfort with a smaller sibling (3400) available
Closing Thoughts
While frameless backpacks may not suit every hiker or type of excursion, they offer a functional, durable, and affordable option for those embracing a lightweight backpacking approach. Careful consideration of packing techniques and gear choices ensures a comfortable and enjoyable experience on the trail. Whether opting for a frameless design or an internal frame pack, the key is to align the choice with individual preferences, trip requirements, and desired comfort levels.
